Questioning the lawfulness, reasonableness, and plausibility of enforcing and implementing the Cybercrime Prevention Act
With at least eleven petitions already filed with the Supreme Court against RA 10175, or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, there's no denying that it is one very questionable law, if not totally bad. With much ado about cyber libel and all its consequences that effectively curtail freedom of speech or of expression, arguably at least, I have a lot of questions on how this controversial law will be implemented. Protesters against the Cybercrime Law [ Source ] Although DOJ Secretary Leila De Lima promised that the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) will " harmonize " the Cybercrime Law, the fact remains that there is still no IRR and none of us has any clue as to how RA 10175 will actually be implemented even if the law already officially took effect on Oct. 3, 2012, fifteen (15) days after it was first published in the Official Gazette . As such, I believe I cannot be faulted for raising some questions. Isn't this wiretapping? Section 12 of the C...